Star Week 5: Khan Academy
Hi everyone! I hope you have enjoyed your holidays and you are back with tones of energy because summer is around the corner. I´m Cristina and I´m going to present to you the tool that I have chosen.The tool that I found really interesting to analyze is Khan Academy because I feel that in the past few years it has become really well known. It was created by Salman Khan in 2008 to provide free education to everyone and everywhere in the world. Khan Academy is a free online educational tool for students and teachers to improve their knowledge, skills and learn in a wide range of courses. It offers all the courses in many languages and it provides instructional videos, quizzes and interactive software for al ages to help the learning of it´s users to become proficient and enjoy different topics. It can be used inside and outside the classroom as a compliment to education and way of learning itself. As it is said in the blog tech and learning, Khan Academy “provides very strong math, economics, and finance resources. It now also offers engineering, computing, arts, and humanities. Plus, there is test and career prep, and English language arts”.
1. Rubric for eLearning Tool EvaluationIn this rubric you can find a fifth column under the title “notes” where there is a small justification and a brief outline on how khan academy works and what it does according to the answer chosen in the rubric.
Category |
Criteria |
Works Well |
Minor Concerns |
Serious Concerns |
Not
applicable |
Notes |
Functionality |
Scale |
The tool can be scaled to accommodate any size class with the
flexibility to create smaller sub-groups or communities of practice
|
The tool can be scaled to accommodate any size class but lacks
flexibility to create smaller sub-groups or communities of practice |
The tool is restrictive to
a limited number of users and cannot be scaled |
|
The tool focusses mainly in individual work and the
progress of each student, so smaller groups or work in groups is not |
Ease of Use |
The tool has a user-friendly interface and it is easy for
instructors and students to become skillful with in a personalized and
intuitive manner. |
The tool has an interface
that may be confusing to either instructor or learner; there is limited
opportunity for personalization. |
The interface is not
user-friendly for either the instructor or learner; it is cumbersome,
unintuitive, rigid, and inflexible. |
|
Khan academy offers tutorial for teachers to show
how to use the tool and courses to increase the teacher´s knowledge. Also
there are some for the students while performing the activities. |
|
Tech Support / Help Availability |
Campus-based technical support and /or help documentation is
readily available and aids users in troubleshooting tasks or solving problems
experienced; or, the tool provider offers a robust support platform |
Technical support and help
documentation is available but limited, incomplete, or not user- friendly |
Technological support and
help documentation is not available |
|
|
|
|
Hypermediality |
The tool allows users to communicate through different channels
(audio, visual, textual) and allows for non-sequential, flexible/adaptive
engagement with material |
The tool allows users to
communicate through different channels (audio, visual, textual) but is
limited in its ability to provide non-sequential, flexible/adaptive
engagement with material |
The tool is restrictive in
terms of the communication channels employed (audio, visual, textual) and
presents information sequentially in a rigid, inflexible format |
|
The tool offers a wide variety of videos to learn
like tutorials according to levels but doesn´t offer communication with
participants. |
Accessibility |
Accessibility standards |
The tool meets accessibility
guidelines (e.g. local accessibility legislation and/or W3C WCAG 2.0 standards) |
The tool has some limited capacity to meet accessibility guidelines |
The tool fails meet accessibility guidelines or no information of
compliance has been made available for the tool |
|
|
User-focused participation |
The tool is designed to address
the needs of diverse users, their various literacies, and capabilities,
thereby widening opportunities for participation in learning |
The tool has some limited capacity to address the needs of diverse
users, their various literacies, and capabilities |
The tool is restrictive in meeting the diversity of needs reflective in
the student body. The tool likely restricts some learners from fully participating. |
|
Khan academy
adapt to the individual usesr according to their performance helping them
grow |
|
Required Equipment |
Proper use of the tool does not
require equipment beyond what is
typically available to instructors and students (computer with built-in
speakers and microphone, internet connection, etc.) |
Proper use of the tool requires specialized equipment (e.g. unique
device) that likely requires purchase at a low cost |
Proper use of the tool requires specialized equipment requiring
moderate to significant financial investment |
|
It is available in any device. |
|
|
Cost of Use |
All aspects of the tool can be
used free of charge. |
Limited aspects of the tool can be used for free with other elements
requiring payment of a fee, membership, or subscription. |
Use of the tool requires a fee, membership, or subscription Use of the
tool requires a purchase that is likely to pose a financial burden on
students (exceeding $50 for a single half term course) |
|
As
the tool itself defines itself: “nonprofit organization with the
mission of providing a free,
world-class education for anyone, anywhere.” |
Technical |
Integration/ Embedding within a Learning Management System (LMS) |
The tool can be embedded (as an object via HTML code) or fully
integrated (e.g. LTI- compliant tools) into an LMS while maintaining full
functionality of the tool. |
The tool can be embedded within an LMS, perhaps with with limited
functionality, but can not be fully integrated. |
The tool can only be accessed
in an LMS through a hyperlink or static representations of the tool (e.g file
export), rather than a functional version of the tool itself |
|
|
Desktop / Laptop Operating Systems |
Users can effectively utilize the tool with any standard, up-to-
date operating system. |
Users may encounter
limited or altered functionality depending on the up-to-date operating system
being used |
Users are limited to using
the tool with one specific, up-to-date operating system. |
|
|
|
Browser |
Users can effectively utilize the tool with any standard, up-to-
date browser |
Users may encounter
limited or altered functionality depending
on the up-to-date browser being used |
Users are limited to using
the tool through one specific browser |
|
It is accessible from any browser and is an online
tool. |
|
|
Additional Downloads |
Users do not need to download additional software or browser
extensions. |
The tool uses a browser
extension or software that requires a download and / or user permission to
run. |
The tool requires a past
or version of a browser extension or software. |
|
The whole
tool is found online with no need to download, this goes for both students
and teachers access. |
Mobile Design |
Access |
The tool can be accessed, either through the download of an app
or via a mobile browser, regardless of the mobile operating system and
device. Design of the mobile tool fully takes into consideration the
constraints of a smaller-sized screen. |
The tool offers an app,
but only for a limited set of
mobile operating systems. Tool is not accessible
through a mobile browser. Design of the mobile tool constrained by the limitations of the mobile device. |
Access to the tool is
limited or absent on a mobile device. |
|
|
Functionality |
There is little to no functional difference between the mobile
and the desktop version, regardless of the device used to access it. No
difference in functionality between apps designed for different mobile
operating systems. |
Core features of the main
tool are functional on the mobile app but advanced features are limited. Some difference in
functionality between apps designed for different mobile operating systems,
but has limited impact on learners’ use of the tool. |
The mobile app functions poorly such that core features are not
reliable or non-existent. Significant difference in
functionality depending on the mobile device’s operating system used to access the tool. |
|
Both, computer and mobile connection to the tool are intuitive
and functional in equal way. |
|
Offline Access |
Offers an offline mode:
Core features of the tool can be accessed and utilized even when offline,
maintaining functionality and content. |
Offers a kind of offline mode, where the tool can be used offline
but core functionality and content are affected. |
The mobile platform cannot
be used in any capacity offline. |
|
You could if you download the content. |
Privacy, Data Protection, and Rights |
Sign Up/ Sign In |
Use of the tool does not require the creation of an external
account or additional login, such that no personal user information is
collected and shared. |
Either instructors are the
only users required to provide personal information to set up
an account; or the tool has been vetted through appropriate channels
to ensure strict adherence to local, institutional, or personal
policies/standards for protecting the collection and use of student personal
data by a third party group. |
All users (instructors and
learners) must provide personal information to a third party in creating an
account and there is some question or concern of the adherence to local,
institutional, or personal policies/standards for protecting the collection
and use of such data by the third party group. |
|
|
Data Privacy and Ownership |
Users maintain ownership and copyright of their intellectual
property/data; the user can keep data private and decide if / how data is to be shared |
Users maintain ownership and copyright of their intellectual
property/data; data is shared publically and cannot be made private |
Users forfeit ownership
and copyright of data; data is shared publically and cannot be made private,
or no details provided. |
|
Only your teacher and class mates in some occasions
see your personal data. |
|
Archiving, Saving, and Exporting Data |
Users can archive, save, or import and export content or activity
data in a variety of formats |
There are limitations to archiving, saving, or importing/exporting
content or activity data |
Content and
activity data cannot be archived, saved,
or imported exported |
|
|
Social Presence |
Collaboration |
The tool has the capacity to support a community of learning
through both asynchronous and synchronous opportunities for communication,
interactivity, and transfer of meaning between users |
The tool has the capacity to support a community of learning through
asynchronous but not synchronous opportunities for communication,
interactivity, and transfer of meaning between users |
Communication,
interactivity, and transfer of meaning between users is not supported or
significantly limited |
|
|
User Accountability |
Instructors can control learner anonymity; the tool provides
technical solutions for holding learners accountable for their actions |
Instructors cannot control learner anonymity but the tool provides
some solution for holding learners accountable for their actions |
Instructors cannot control
learner anonymity and there is no technical solution for holding users
accountable to their actions |
|
|
|
Diffusion |
The tool is widely known
and popular, it’s likely that most learners are familiar with the tool and
have basic technical competence with it |
Learners’ familiarity with the tool is likely mixed, some will
lack basic technical competence with its functions |
The tool is not well
known/foreign, it is likely that learners are not familiar with the tool and
lack basic technical competence with its functions |
|
But knowledge on how to use the tool is rapidly
acquired. |
Teaching
Presence |
Facilitation |
The tool has easy-to-use features that would significantly
improve an instructor’s ability to
be present with learners via active management, monitoring, engagement, and
feedback |
The tool has limited
functionality to effectively support an instructor’s ability to be present
with learners via active management, monitoring, engagement, and feedback |
The tool has not been
designed to support an instructor’s an instructor’s ability to be present
with learners via active management, monitoring, engagement, and feedback |
|
Customization |
Tool is adaptable to its environment: easily customized to suit the classroom
context and targeted learning outcomes |
Limited aspects of the tool can be customized to suit the classroom
context and learning outcomes |
The tool cannot be
customized |
|
|
|
Learning Analytics |
Instructor can monitor learners’ performance on a variety of
responsive measures. These measures can be accessed through a user-friendly
dashboard |
Instructor can monitor learners’ performance on limited measures; or
data is not presented in a format that is easily interpreted |
The tool does not support
the collection of learning analytics |
|
Cognitive
Presence |
Enhancement of Cognitive Task(s) |
The tool enhances
engagement in targeted cognitive task(s) that were once overly complex or
inconceivable through other means |
The tool enables functional improvement to engagement in the
targeted cognitive task(s) |
The tool acts as a direct
tool substitute with no functional change to engagement in the targeted
cognitive task(s) |
|
Higher Order Thinking |
Use of the tool easily facilitates learners to exercise higher
order thinking skills (given consideration to design, facilitation, and
direction from instructor) |
The tool may engage
learners in higher order thinking skills (given significant consideration to
design, facilitation, and direction from instructor) |
The tool likely does not
engage learners in higher order thinking skills (despite significant
consideration to design, facilitation, and direction from instructor) |
|
|
Metacognitive Engagement |
Through the tool, learners can regularly receive formative
feedback on learning (i.e. they can track their performance, monitor their
improvement, test their knowledge) |
Opportunities for
receiving formative feedback on learning are available, but infrequent or
limited (i.e. poor opportunities for tracking performance, monitoring
improvement, testing knowledge on a regular basis) |
There are no opportunities
for formative feedback on learning (i.e. lacking opportunities for tracking
performance, monitoring improvement, testing knowledge on a regular basis) |
|
2. Exploring the analysis by Common Sense Privacy Program.
In conclusion, it is a tool that I highly recomend using because it doesn´t only teach but motivate students to continue studying and learning. I had the opportunity of working with Khan Academy in primary school in Numeracy and my favourite things about it were the weekly challenges proposed as well as the small avatars that grew as you completed activities and you increased the points you had by doing them.
Let me know which is your favourite avatar in the coment below!
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario